I recently used the 99 Designs site to crowdsource the website design and logo for my new company, Extreme Collaboration. Extreme Collaboration is itself a crowdsource play – inviting salespeople and marketing to help growing companies for a share of the profits they create, and in some cases, jobs
Promising a $1,000 prize for the best website home page and inner page templates, and $350 for the best logo, yielded 82 entries for website design and 225 logo ideas, both including variations on themes. Compare this to the ‘old’ Internet bubble days, where a few thousand dollars to one designer or agency would get you three website variations to choose from.
Here are ways to make your graphic design crowdsource contest as effective as possible:
- Be a cheerleader. There’s a critical mass with design contests – the more people submitting designs, the more others decide they need to participate too. After a few days, we only had a handful of designs provided, definitely not our vision… So it’s essential to get to a critical mass of 20-30 designs, which you encourage by providing same-day feedback to the first designers individually and in the group discussion area. Also, post your contest to friends on sites like Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter. Work to achieve 10 entries, even including variations from the first few designers. On 99 Designs, this enables you to guarantee the prize will be paid out to someone (otherwise you can say ‘no thanks’ to all submitters). The guarantee doubled my number of entries by the next day and started an upward level of activity.
- Be a coach. Once a designer is in the project, they will take your direction very seriously as it increases the odds of a winning payout to them. So keep the direction fairly open at the outset to allow for creativity, but once you’ve decided which types of designs will work, don’t hesitate to restrict new input in this direction. After the first week, we laid out every desig across a table and applied requirements such as layout of elements you could see without scrolling and colors we liked, then told every designer to follow the same direction in week two. This took some getting used to for the designers who wanted latitude, but it gives you many more options that fit your needs.
- Stay brief. Our original web specification was 5 pages long, explaining our business, customers, culture and website constraints to give more precise direction to designers. One designer said it was the most thorough spec he’d seen, but it turns out most designers won’t join the contest if the spec is longer than 2-3 pages. In the end, we slimmed the spec down to the essentials for proposing our designs, and relied on iterative feedback to take it further.
- Cultivate the real experts. Hidden among the many design contributors who are treating their submission as a quick-effort, one-time bet on whether they can make money, are a handful of designers who care about your success and their craft. These are people you want to make friends with, reaching them through private contest messages or Skype. They’ll answer design implementation questions like which video player to use and which menu schemes are easier to render, point out if they’ve seen other design submissions somewhere on the Web already. Realize that you win not when you pick a design, but when it’s successfully implemented, so prefer the designs of these artisans. You should stay in touch with them after the contest, as they can give you input (or services) over the course of your business.
- Get outside feedback. In a dozen years in marketing, I’ve seen time and again that what you as business exec think is a good design will vary tremendously from what your colleagues and customers think. When we had 60 logo designs, we polled 25 friends-of-the-firm to ask what handful of designs they liked best. No single design received more than 3 votes! Some folks wanted flashy graphics, other were more concrete in getting ‘meaning’ of the company’s services into the design, some wanted muted colors, other more eye-catching. My business partner and I picked the 4 designs we liked best, then put it out to vote again (the two of us had different opinions on the best), and finally picked a winner that worked for us and that the majority of input providers also voted for.
- Be human. The ‘crowd’ of designers is judging you, too and will criticize your process if not run well – not great for the karma of your contest. In situations where your feedback is less than prompt (let’s see, because you have other priorities running your business?) or your direction changes, apologies are in order. And clarifications both to the group and leading design individuals should follow.
In the end, crowdsourcing designs is a great, cost-effective way to receive a lot of variations that you, or a single designer, never would have considered. The process requires time and nurturing to get off the ground and see through to a quality result. At it’s best, however, it holds the seeds of a community of creative supporters that can help you even after the contest is over.
Here’s our winning website design by Mads Ejsing of Denmark.
